Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Maximum\s+size\s+of\s+capacitance\s+top\s+hat\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Maximum\s+size\s+of\s+capacitance\s+top\s+hat\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Maximum size of capacitance top hat? (score: 1): Author: "George Stewart, VK5ALS" <ggstewart@adam.com.au>; Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:32:20 +1030; Hi Topbanders, Just picking up on a point that Tom, W8JI made in the thread currently running on "Short, Fat Vertical": "More capacitance at the top is a good idea, SO LONG AS YOU DON'T MOVE THE CURR; /archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00207.html (7,999 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Maximum size of capacitance top hat? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 05:55:04 -0500; Someone will have to model your vertical George, but if you don't move the antenna much below resonance on the operating frequency you are safe. The 20 foot hat should be no problem at all. Are you; /archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00213.html (9,816 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]