Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Monopole\s+Elev\s+Pattern\s+w\.r\.t\.\s+Earth\s+Conductivity\s*$/: 51 ]

Total 51 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: "N4IS" <n4is@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:02:19 -0400
Herb A good way to test a TX antenna is to listen to one of the many SDR receivers available on line << We can use the reverse beacon network. RBN, select DX spot HF > 160m http://www.reversebeacon.n
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00345.html (11,193 bytes)

42. Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:22:05 -0400
On 10/25/2012 11:51 AM, Tom W8JI wrote: Qualitative or Quantitative...Let me get this straight. If I call CQ and the band is open to Europe on 160 and nobody replies after a couple of hours with my T
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00349.html (12,233 bytes)

43. Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: cris blak <cyo3fff@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
In order to estimate what is the real elevation angle (3dB or HPBW) of an antenna on far field, we should gather quantitative data. Tom, what you are after with your measurements/observation? If one
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00351.html (15,028 bytes)

44. Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: cris blak <cyo3fff@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
The above term comes from the measurement technique. I'll explain theme below. Qualitative measurement are when the measurement of a phenomenon or object parameter is expressed as meeting a certain
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00352.html (12,850 bytes)

45. Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Kiessig" <kiessig@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:22:11 +1300
nowadays, I don't raise a skimmer in EU for several weeks, JA, ZL or VK since August. Keep in mind that both of the Skimmers in ZL have very poor reception on 160. ZL2RV is using a short active ante
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00354.html (10,528 bytes)

46. Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:37:16 -0400
In order to estimate what is the real elevation angle (3dB or HPBW) of an antenna on far field, we should gather quantitative data. Tom, what you are after with your measurements/observation?>>> Only
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00355.html (14,466 bytes)

47. Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:50:59 -0400
The experience here during the stations contest days of the 90's was with a high inverted V at 160-180' (added 20' to the tower after a lightning hit) along with a pair of 1/4 wave verticals with 32
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00360.html (15,420 bytes)

48. Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:37:42 -0400
I stand by my remarks. This still does not substitute for the lack of confirming data at farther distances. If there is data contradicting NEC4 out at distances like 50 km, bring it on. We would all
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00361.html (18,421 bytes)

49. Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: W7RH <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 17:40:06 -0700
I'm intrigued by the number of comments on this thread. I'll offer my two cents as if there are a few who might concur. Size matters only in the length and density of the ground plane elements. Elect
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00362.html (10,121 bytes)

50. Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Fry" <rfry@adams.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 08:02:08 -0500
Presumably the above text was meant to read "So far NEC4 has _NOT_ predicted any real measurements, regardless of operator skill." Some may not recall the comparison of groundwave fields calculated b
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00363.html (12,739 bytes)

51. Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Fry" <rfry@adams.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 09:03:30 -0500
In my first post of this date I wrote, "Another important observation to be made from that NEC data is that space-wave radiation from elevation angles below ~2 degrees equals the radiation in the gro
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00364.html (8,688 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu