- 1. Topband: Mr. good Ears ! VK2KRR (score: 1)
- Author: "dick.bingham" <dick.bingham@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:17:55 -0700
- Greetings all I was running WSPR at 5-watts on 160-meters and received this report from VK-Land A 13001KM path. Looks like now is a good time to work some LONG-haul DX on topband. 73 Dick/w7wkr. CN98
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-09/msg00058.html (6,734 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: Mr. good Ears ! VK2KRR (score: 1)
- Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:12:24 -0400
- 5 Watts - Wow! What are you using for a TX antenna? Art _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-09/msg00059.html (7,302 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: Mr. good Ears ! VK2KRR (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:29:00 -0700
- Remember that WSPR and K1JT's JT65 and JT9 have a LOT of noise immunity. JT65 can decode down to at least -24dB, JT9 to -26dB, WSPR to -29dB. The dB reference is, I think, the noise in the RX bandwid
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-09/msg00060.html (8,115 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: Mr. good Ears ! VK2KRR (score: 1)
- Author: Merv Schweigert <k9fd@flex.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:33:59 -1000
- Runnning WSPR on 474.2 KHZ and : VK3ELV 2015-09-10 10:52Z 475.726 QF33BQ 5 watts -29 Not quite as far as yours, but he was copied also up into north west USA last nite, Antenna efficiency on 475 a lo
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-09/msg00061.html (7,884 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: Mr. good Ears ! VK2KRR (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 19:48:37 -0500
- I believe that whenever possible, the use of JT65 should be discouraged in favor of JT9 on HF and *especially* 160. JT65 is an EME mode and below 15 meters, it is INFERIOR to JT9 as Jim pointed out.
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-09/msg00062.html (9,039 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu