Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+My\s+Turn\s+For\s+a\s+Brain\s+Pick\s+\-\s+Sanity\s+Check\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+My\s+Turn\s+For\s+a\s+Brain\s+Pick\s+\-\s+Sanity\s+Check\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: My Turn For a Brain Pick - Sanity Check (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:44:06 -0700; I agree. For me, the primary design objectives are maximizing forward gain, beamwidth, and gain bandwidth. I don't care about F/B. 73, Jim K9YC All good topband ops know how to put up a beverage at n; /archives//html/Topband/2013-06/msg00048.html (9,717 bytes)
22. Re: Topband: My Turn For a Brain Pick - Sanity Check (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:17:46 -0400; I agree. For me, the primary design objectives are maximizing forward gain, beamwidth, and gain bandwidth. I don't care about F/B. Null depth is maximum when radiation is equal from the two elements,; /archives//html/Topband/2013-06/msg00049.html (10,690 bytes)
23. Re: Topband: My Turn For a Brain Pick - Sanity Check (score: 1): Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:16:48 -0400; I agree. For me, the primary design objectives are maximizing forward gain, beamwidth, and gain bandwidth. I don't care about F/B. 73, Jim K9YC Ditto as Ive already mentioned as F/R isnt useful to me; /archives//html/Topband/2013-06/msg00051.html (10,047 bytes)
24. Re: Topband: My Turn For a Brain Pick - Sanity Check (score: 1): Author: Jim GM <jim.gmforum@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:35:24 -0500; Jim Sounds like you have a great 40M antenna for filed Day. QRP sounds like fun. All you need now is brats and beer and something to keep you warm at night. -- Right. There's some discussion of this; /archives//html/Topband/2013-06/msg00053.html (8,554 bytes)
25. Re: Topband: My Turn For a Brain Pick - Sanity Check (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:07:50 -0400; Right. There's some discussion of this in the ON4UN book, where I found the Christman matching. As published there, it's 84 degrees of 50 ohm line in each element, plus 71 degrees of 50 ohm line in t; /archives//html/Topband/2013-06/msg00054.html (10,119 bytes)
26. Re: Topband: My Turn For a Brain Pick - Sanity Check (score: 1): Author: Jim GM <jim.gmforum@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 11:45:51 -0500; Hi Jim How well did you do on FieldDay? How well did the 2 element vertical array perform? -- Jim K9TF _________________ Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2013-07/msg00000.html (5,942 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 26
Page: [1] [2]