Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+New\s+TX\s+antenna\s+for\s+80\s+and\s+160\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+New\s+TX\s+antenna\s+for\s+80\s+and\s+160\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: New TX antenna for 80 and 160? (score: 1): Author: "Rick Kiessig" <kiessig@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 18:27:55 +1300; Until recently, I was planning to put up an inverted-L as a TX antenna for 80 and 160. However, things have changed, and it no longer looks like I'll be able to run the radials I would need to have a; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00064.html (8,596 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: New TX antenna for 80 and 160? (score: 1): Author: Dan Simmonds <dan@kk3an.com>; Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 01:37:30 -0500; Hi Rick, I've been down this same road as you - starting with a low (18 metre) dipole, and after 1+ year of using it, I was only able to copy & work just (1) DX station from here in the Northeast US; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00065.html (11,256 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: New TX antenna for 80 and 160? (score: 1): Author: Renee K6FSB <k6fsb.1@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 22:52:28 -0800; Hi RickIn regards to copperweld near the ocean, here in California wire near the coast, my copperweld has not held up too well as the steel rusts then fails due to intrusion through any damage to the; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00066.html (10,665 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: New TX antenna for 80 and 160? (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 07:49:48 -0500; I recently built a dipole for 40/20/15 using 300 ohm twinlead, which worked out very well, so I'm thinking of using a similar approach for this antenna, using the full length for 160, and trimming on; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00067.html (11,011 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: New TX antenna for 80 and 160? (score: 1): Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 11:14:46 -0500; My first 160 antenna was an 80M dipole that I shorted the feedline and fed as T with only a ground rod. It was only about 50 feet high through the trees. While it was not a great antenna (my construc; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00069.html (11,899 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: New TX antenna for 80 and 160? (score: 1): Author: Buck wh7dx <Wh7dx@hawaii.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 08:55:51 -1000; Hello, Your location sounds similar to mine. I'm on a hill about 200 ft up and about 100-150 yards from ocean. I figured I'd throw yet another dipole over the tallest tree behind me. It's only about; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00101.html (10,558 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]