- 1. Topband: New Vertical performance (score: 1)
- Author: W5UN <w5un@wt.net>
- Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:03:53 +0000
- I wasn't in the contest for competition, just trying out my new 140' ground plane vertical with elevated radials. Using mostly S&P operating, in one hour, forty minutes on Saturday night twenty-five
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00200.html (7,042 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: New Vertical performance (score: 1)
- Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz
- Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 23:59:19 GMT
- Condx from here were far from great. After a very promising opening 12hrs before the start of the test, the band appeared to close right up for the 2 nights of the test itself. Only PJ2T and KV4FZ he
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00203.html (6,648 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: New Vertical performance (score: 1)
- Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:24:23 +0100
- So I conclude the following - (1) either the conditions were great; (2) the new vertical is working well; or (3) both the above are true. The band was great. The only problem was keyclicks from VERY
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00206.html (7,440 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: New Vertical performance (score: 1)
- Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:57:35 +0100
- After a very promising opening 12hrs before the start of the test, the band appeared to close right up for the 2 nights of the test itself. Only PJ2T and KV4FZ heard from here, and prop never went as
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00207.html (7,512 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu