Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+New\s+guy\s+here\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+New\s+guy\s+here\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: New guy here (score: 1): Author: steve d <kc8qvo@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 13:19:06 -0800 (PST); Well apparently I hit the jackpot for information regarding 160! I figured since this reflector was published in ON4UN's low band dxing it was a good place to go. Boy was I right! Well someone (or a; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00050.html (7,161 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: New guy here (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 19:31:15 -0500; low pass filter. I have the Kenwood model. You would want a high pass, not a low pass. A high pass that cuts off the AM BC band might help in rare situations, a lowpass would never help. Unless you; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00058.html (7,644 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]