Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+No\s+DX\s+Window\s+in\s+2009\s+CQ\s+160\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+No\s+DX\s+Window\s+in\s+2009\s+CQ\s+160\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: No DX Window in 2009 CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:28:31 -0500; Regarding DX windows, please note in the new CQ 160 rules below, THERE IS NO DX WINDOW. I hope all QRG police will read the rules before they start anonymously sending "WINDOW" on top of stations. I; /archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00152.html (7,196 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: No DX Window in 2009 CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth D. Grimm, K4XL" <grimm@sbc.edu>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:26:13 -0500; The only thing wrong with DX Window protection was that no one was willing and/or empowered to enforce the rule. I'm no contester, but to me this is akin to making larceny legal because people steal; /archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00159.html (8,773 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]