Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Noise\s+Cancellers\s+performance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Noise\s+Cancellers\s+performance\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Noise cancellers performance (score: 1): Author: "Petr Ourednik" <indians@xsmail.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:03:33 +0200; Hello, I know that it was discussed on the reflector already but as I found another type for competition I would like to ask over here if anyone compared DX Engineering NCC-1, the MFJ-1026 and the Ti; /archives//html/Topband/2008-09/msg00030.html (6,966 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Noise cancellers performance (score: 1): Author: "Tod -ID" <tod@k0to.us>; Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:13:59 -0600; Petr: I have used and reported on the MFJ-1026 [see www.k0to.us for information]. Last year I installed the NCC-1 with dual active verticals and was testing that. I did not use it to null noise becau; /archives//html/Topband/2008-09/msg00032.html (8,509 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Noise cancellers performance (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:19:41 -0700; I have an ANC-4. It is a MASSIVE key click generator if you put it inline with your transmitter. Other than that it works. :) This is caused by the circuit that detects when you're transmitting and d; /archives//html/Topband/2008-09/msg00033.html (7,538 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Noise cancellers performance (score: 1): Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>; Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 13:40:56 +0200; Hello Petr, I have the DX-Engineering NCC-1 and compared it against my friends MFJ1026. The MFJ is more difficult to adjust and tricky. It has as no full 360 degreee coverage on the phase control kno; /archives//html/Topband/2008-09/msg00034.html (10,543 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Noise cancellers performance (score: 1): Author: "Tim Duffy K3LR" <k3lr@k3lr.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 09:15:33 -0500; I have used all four of these cancellers on 160 meters. The MFJ-1026, ANC-4, SEM and DXE NCC-1. The NCC-1 works the best for us, with the 1026 coming in second. I could never see any receiving improv; /archives//html/Topband/2008-09/msg00035.html (8,932 bytes)
6. Topband: Noise Cancellers performance (score: 1): Author: "Neil Carr G0JHC" <g0jhc@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 17:52:56 +0100; I have used the MFJ 1026 for about 9 months now, picked one up on ebay for around $130, it did little (nothing) for me until I (recently) started using a 66ft 80m vertical as the sense Ant. Prior to; /archives//html/Topband/2008-09/msg00038.html (8,296 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Noise cancellers performance (score: 1): Author: "Raoul Coetzee" <raoulc@smmcape.co.za>; Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:12:27 +0200; ANC-4 noise cancellers? How much difference there are in Petr, I have been using an MFJ 1026 for a few years now, thanks to W5IZ. If used correctly, it will perform as designed. The internal pre-amp; /archives//html/Topband/2008-09/msg00042.html (9,291 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]