Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Noise\s+cancelling\s+devices\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Noise\s+cancelling\s+devices\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Noise cancelling devices (score: 1): Author: "Josep" <ea6bf@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:22:44 -0000; Hi gang, I would like to know about those Noise Cancellers by MFJ. I have seen on their web-page that there are two, the 1025 and 1026 models. Are they the same but just one of ´em is improved; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00180.html (6,535 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Noise cancelling devices (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 06:20:46 -0500; Thanks all for the replays, I will go to Tom´s page and have a look to that 1025/1026 information. FYI, past weekend line noise here were steady S9 all the way. Tonight we´ve had some rai; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00185.html (7,201 bytes)
3. Topband: Noise cancelling devices (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:27:49 -0500; EA6BF: Josep, you might consider waiting until after Dayton before making a decision. I've heard rumors of a new product from a different manufacturer with better dynamic range and phase performance; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00187.html (6,550 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]