- 1. Topband: Noon time condx (score: 1)
- Author: "Bruce" <k1fz@prexar.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:07:08 -0500
- Hi John AA1K, I worked W2GD at 1748 UTC and signals were dropping. Skip was going to high angle again. Another 10 minutes all I could hear was KC1XX in neighboring New Hampshire about S-5. Earlier KE
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00427.html (6,800 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: Noon time condx (score: 1)
- Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:08:46 -0600
- Hmmm... Thor burped? The sun winked? Long delayed echoes? (snicker snicker) This reminds me of a story told to me by my friend Al-K0AD about Chicago "back in the 'olden' days." This was before the d
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00436.html (9,029 bytes)
- 3. Topband: Noon time condx (score: 1)
- Author: Carl K9LA <k9la@gte.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:40:38 -0500
- . . . snip . . . I grew up in Hammond (northwest Indiana) and the 160m mobile operations that Ford referred to had a lot to do with the daily Calumet Area Emergency Net on 1805KHz (if I remember corr
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00444.html (7,932 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: Noon time condx (score: 1)
- Author: "earlham@radiks.net" <earlham@radiks.net>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:35:25 -0500
- I certainly don't claim to be enough of a physicist to fully understand propagation with any degree of expertise. That said, I have learned over the years that QSO's at high noon over a 1200 mile pat
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00028.html (7,464 bytes)
- 5. Topband: Noon time condx (score: 1)
- Author: "jon jones" <n0jk@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 21:56:50 +0000
- W4AN GA was fair copy to KS around 1700 UTC. I suspect the daytime 160M prop. is related to decreased D-layer ionization due to the lower solar angle in the winter. WLW 700 Cinncy, OH, WBBM 780 and
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00060.html (7,311 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu