Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s+A\/B\s+Test\s+Results\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s+A\/B\s+Test\s+Results\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Omni VI+ A/B Test Results (score: 1): Author: k6se at juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Sun Jun 22 17:35:22 2003; I've long wanted to check the Ten-Tec Omni VI+ for diggimg weak signals out of the noise. I was able to finally talk a local ham (who is an avid Ten-Tec'er) who attends our daily coffee get-togethers; /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00037.html (9,004 bytes)
2. Topband: Omni VI+ A/B Test Results (score: 1): Author: brehm at ptitest.com (Brad Rehm); Date: Sun Jun 22 20:13:09 2003; "He tweaked everything he could on his radio to peak the signal as best as he could, but the MP was clearly much better. Best results were obtained with the Omni VI+ when using the 250-Hz filter and; /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00038.html (7,243 bytes)
3. Topband: Omni VI+ A/B Test Results (score: 1): Author: W4EF at dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Tue Jun 24 06:11:12 2003; How weak were the signals that you guys were listening to? I am wondering if your ranking is just simply a measure of which receivers have the best noise figure. It would be interesting to repeat the; /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00044.html (8,347 bytes)
4. Topband: Omni VI+ A/B Test Results (score: 1): Author: k6se at juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Tue Jun 24 15:11:56 2003; "I would agree that what you say is true as long as you are sure that the signals you are listening to are well above the receiver's thermal noise floor." == The "band" (atmospheric) noise on 160-met; /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00056.html (7,089 bytes)
5. Topband: Omni VI+ A/B Test Results (score: 1): Author: kr9u at arrl.net (James Wolf); Date: Tue Jun 24 21:43:22 2003; I'd have to dig out the reference if requested, but atmospheric noise as a function of frequency is about 30 dB more at 2 MHz than it is at 30 MHz. James Wolf, KR9U "I would agree that what you say i; /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00064.html (7,467 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]