Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Pennant\s+performance\s+observations\/issue\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Pennant\s+performance\s+observations\/issue\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Pennant performance observations/issue (score: 1): Author: w2pm@aol.com; Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 10:45:10 -0400; The following activities about Pennants resulted in me noticing a shielding effect from nearby objects to the antenna which is significant, and also raises a question over high angle/low angle recept; /archives//html/Topband/2007-03/msg00075.html (9,807 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Pennant performance observations/issue (score: 1): Author: Ralph Matheny <mathenyr@marietta.edu>; Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 23:08:58 -0400 (EDT); My loops are also very influenced by the hillside where they are built. I have pretty good reception to Europe and Africa, Ok in the South, but I am pretty bad off into the Pacific, which is thru the; /archives//html/Topband/2007-03/msg00078.html (7,290 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Pennant performance observations/issue (score: 1): Author: "Donald Chester" <k4kyv@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:42:25 +0000; From: Ralph Matheny <mathenyr@marietta.edu> As you say, the loops/flags/ are a great tool in a tight situation, as here in town with little space. Use >them all the time, even for 75 meter rag chews!; /archives//html/Topband/2007-03/msg00092.html (8,610 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Pennant performance observations/issue (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:40:03 EDT; Has anyone been able to use these antennas get good nulls for relatively short skip distances (150-1000 miles) on 160? What about 80/75? I have had some good results with directional receiving antenn; /archives//html/Topband/2007-03/msg00095.html (8,863 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]