Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Phased\s+active\s+anntennas\s+on\s+160m\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Phased\s+active\s+anntennas\s+on\s+160m\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Phased active anntennas on 160m (score: 1): Author: Paul and Abbi Elliott <paab@gte.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 20:10:57 -0500; Does anybody have any design and/or construction information on a pair short vertical antennas without tophats or guys (but posibly with amplification at each antenna) for receiving on 160m? I am loo; /archives//html/Topband/2004-09/msg00098.html (7,025 bytes)
2. RE: Topband: Phased active anntennas on 160m (score: 1): Author: "earlham@radiks.net" <earlham@radiks.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:08:26 -0400; W8JI's excellent website (W8JI.com) provides detail on a 4 square array made of short verticals (20' in height). I have built the array and can attest it performs well if properly contructed. My own; /archives//html/Topband/2004-09/msg00107.html (8,770 bytes)
3. RE: Topband: Phased active anntennas on 160m (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:23:59 -0700 (PDT); I used to have a 4 element vertical receive array using 30 foot verticals w/o top hats. Although they were guyed, I could have put in more substantial bases and dispensed with the guying. Add a shun; /archives//html/Topband/2004-09/msg00108.html (8,230 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]