- 1. Topband: Pixel vs BOG (score: 1)
- Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 09:55:42 -0400
- Mixed reviews. Pixel loop antenna vs 200 foot BOG antenna at VO1HP. www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTXvcEwgUsU 73 Bruce-k1fz www.qsl.net/k1fz/bogantennanotes/index.html _________________ Topband R
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-04/msg00151.html (6,554 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: Pixel vs BOG (score: 1)
- Author: Kenneth Grimm <grimm@sbc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:25:04 -0400
- Wow! The BOG blows the Pixel loop away. The loop sounds like my vertical! I wonder if there might be a feedline problem? Surely the loop isn't meant to be that noisy. 73, Ken - K4XL _________________
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-04/msg00152.html (7,784 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: Pixel vs BOG (score: 1)
- Author: "Chortek, Robert L." <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:31:30 +0000
- It was not clear the loop was rotated to null the noise. IF SO, that's a BIG improvement in SN Bob AA6VB Sent from my iPhone _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-04/msg00153.html (8,493 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: Pixel vs BOG (score: 1)
- Author: donovanf@starpower.net
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:38:08 -0400 (EDT)
- Hi Ken, Small diameter "magnetic" loops such as the Pixel can be very effective in nulling a single vertically polarized local RFI source, fortunately most local RFI sources are vertically polarized.
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-04/msg00154.html (8,784 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: Pixel vs BOG (score: 1)
- Author: "David Harmon" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:45:22 -0500
- On the vid....he says the Pixel is 30' high. That is too high. My Pixel is nowhere near that noisy. It is 7' high located in the clear. 73 David Harmon K6XYZ Sperry, OK --Original Message-- From: Top
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-04/msg00155.html (8,195 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu