Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Polyphaser\s+IS\-50UX\-CO\s+vs\s+ICE\s+Model\s+303\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303? (score: 1)
Author: cx7tt@4email.net
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:53:09 -0200
Hello, Am in the process of running underground coax/control cables to DXE UE-1P Grounding and Utility box IOT run 40m V dipole and topband inverted L/FCP. I have had the Polyphaser 50UX in the HF sy
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00134.html (7,095 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303? (score: 1)
Author: HAROLD SMITH JR <w0rihps@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:15:00 -0800 (PST)
Hello Tom,   I have Polyphaser and I.C.E. units on all my cables ( Antenna and all Control ). I installed them in 1991 after several strikes damaged my Tranceivers. Since then, I have had no problems
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00137.html (7,933 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303? (score: 1)
Author: "John K9UWA" <john@johnjeanantiqueradio.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 15:56:53 -0500
Like Price I was seriously hit in 1989 lost all radios computers TV sets other appliances lots of coax and switches. Never again. Three towers the tallest is 185 feet. So I am the local lightening ro
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00141.html (9,741 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:58:14 -0600
The polyphasers are good protectors but be aware that they rely on gas tubes for protection and their failure mode is one that leaves you unknowingly unprotected. After so many ionizations the gas tu
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00143.html (9,338 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303? (score: 1)
Author: cx7tt@4email.net
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 07:40:27 -0200
On Sun Jan 20 01:58:14 2013, Cecil wrote: The polyphasers are good protectors but be aware that they rely on gas tubes for protection and their failure mode is one that leaves you unknowingly unprote
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00145.html (8,666 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 08:56:07 -0800
Several points here. First, there is no value to lightning suppression at the base of a tower unless that tower is next to the shack. A lightning suppressor shorts the center conductor to the shield
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00146.html (9,557 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:45:29 -0500
The polyphasers are good protectors but be aware that they rely on gas tubes for protection and their failure mode is one that leaves you unknowingly unprotected. After so many ionizations the gas tu
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00150.html (9,231 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:41:47 -0500
Could that not be said of any inline protection then? Almost, anything but a disconnect. Also, while we sometimes go wild with grounds, nearly ALL of the protection (or lack of protection) comes from
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00151.html (9,852 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu