Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Portable\s+160M\s+Antenna\s+Options\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Portable\s+160M\s+Antenna\s+Options\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Portable 160M Antenna Options (score: 1): Author: "WA7VNI" <wa7vni@dayshaw.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:48:12 -0800; Hi All, I've been playing around with the idea of trying the next 160 M contest from a portable location. Here's the deal. Any thoughts on the installation described below will be appreciated. I can; /archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00166.html (8,742 bytes)
2. RE: Topband: Portable 160M Antenna Options (score: 1): Author: "WA7VNI" <wa7vni@dayshaw.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:47:22 -0800; I guess I should have mentioned that the reason I wanted to try the portable operation was to have a better 160M antenna/ground than the small dipole with the openwire feedline shorted and fed as a l; /archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00167.html (7,852 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Portable 160M Antenna Options (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 21:34:20 -0500; Just remember the skin depth of saltwater is very very shallow on 160, so any portion of radials or ground plates extending more than several inches below the surface would have no use at all for RF; /archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00169.html (7,608 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]