Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Post\s+contest\s+season\:\s+TX\s+antenna\s+vs\s+RX\s+antenna\s+cros\-stalk\.\s+What\s+do\s+you\s+do\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Post contest season: TX antenna vs RX antenna cros-stalk. What do you do? (score: 1)
Author: Mark van Wijk <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:44:56 +0100 (CET)
Now that we are 'sort of in post contest season mode' and sharing some good ideas, there is another question: During recent Field-day setups I noticed severe cross-talk issues between TX antennas and
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00193.html (7,874 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Post contest season: TX antenna vs RX antenna cros-stalk. What do you do? (score: 1)
Author: william radice <k4owr@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 13:05:11 +0000
Most use individual band filters and they almost completely eliminate the issue. At our station we used the Dunestar filters for operating positions on different bands. As for 160 I personally use t
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00195.html (9,479 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Post contest season: TX antenna vs RX antenna cros-stalk. What do you do? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark van Wijk, PA5MW" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 07:38:33 +0100
Hi Bill, I think this is not what I meant here; I also do use BPF's and the Front End Savers. The problem is that while listening to your receiving antennas, there is also some signal from the transm
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00207.html (10,559 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Post contest season: TX antenna vs RX antenna cros-stalk. What do you do? (score: 1)
Author: "Terry Posey" <tposey@nettally.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 07:04:48 -0400
Hi Mark - I have not experienced K3 TX/RX antenna isolation problems with my station configuration. I expect that if there is an isolation problem with your rig's TX and external RX antenna routing/s
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00208.html (9,166 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Post contest season: TX antenna vs RX antenna cros-stalk. What do you do? (score: 1)
Author: Filipe Lopes <ct1ilt@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:04:29 +0100
I am using 2xTS590 and never had any issues either. 73s Filipe CT1ILT CR6K _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00209.html (10,917 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Post contest season: TX antenna vs RX antenna cros-stalk. What do you do? (score: 1)
Author: "JC" <n4is@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:14:35 -0400
input during RX mode' ?<< There are several reasons why it is necessary to detune the TX antenna during RX, however disconnecting the center of the TX coax during RX on 160m is a MUST. If you don't
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00210.html (10,648 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Post contest season: TX antenna vs RX antenna cros-stalk. What do you do? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:11:33 -0700
There are many heads to this snake, but also many fixes. This post is about crosstalk, NOT interaction. First, there is coupling between the antennas themselves. Cross-band interference between trans
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00214.html (12,412 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Post contest season: TX antenna vs RX antenna cros-stalk. What do you do? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark van Wijk, PA5MW" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 11:49:59 +0100
Thanks Jim, Our learning point so far: Our fixed setups usually had harmonic coax stub filters per individual antenna. Antenna interaction was carefully measured with help of a spectrum analyzer (wor
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00221.html (14,630 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Post contest season: TX antenna vs RX antenna cros-stalk. What do you do? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 01:09:44 -0700
You may find my applications note on optimizing the location of harmonic stubs useful. It's on my website. k9yc.com/publish.htm Using the technique I've described, stubs can be 20-30 dB more effectiv
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00225.html (9,918 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu