Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Proper\s+Decorum\s+On\s+The\s+\"Gentleman\'s\s+Band\"\.\.\.\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 07:46:31 -0500
Hi Guys, This morning, after calling a general "CQ" several times on an apparently vacant frequency, the passband of my receiver was inundated by someone deliberately sending a continuous string of r
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00061.html (8,024 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:48:35 -0500
The "Gentleman's Band" has been dead a long time, Eddy. It's now inhabited by the same type of operators that infest all the other bands. As for QRL? It's often used by lids on the DX's frequency to
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00063.html (7,488 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: "Jim F." <j_fitton@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 07:05:43 -0800 (PST)
What I hear lately are those who send QRL  (Not  QRL?)  a couple of times and then call CQ.   It drives me bonkers.   A smart engineer I used to work with at Western Electric said: (paraphrasing)   M
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00064.html (8,690 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:03:55 -0500
Hi Eddy, While I agree 100% with you, sadly this is nothing new. You only need to look back to Hiram Maxim's "rotten QRM" and the Wouf Hong to see the longevity of this RF Graffiti. I'm guessing that
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00067.html (8,689 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: "Dave G4GED" <radiodave.g4ged@tiscali.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:40:08 -0800
I believe that it's high time for every piece of transmitting equipment sold, to have enbedded an indelible unique identity code which is included in a high-speed burst with every transmission or by
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00070.html (8,448 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:04:43 -0800
Yes, the response to bad behavior seems to be more bad behavior. Sometimes the response to QRM is 10x as bad as the QRM. Sometimes a polite and directed response can be constructive (as in "EF up" if
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00073.html (9,084 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:40:10 -0500
Hi, Some of the things that happen on the radio - including on top band, are very disappointing and can be irritating. I have two or three *other* activities like playing a musical instrument, garden
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00075.html (8,355 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: Mark van Wijk <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:44:26 +0100
So, in these times of "I want it all at no effort", let's raise the bar. Create new thresholds, filters etc. at which only serious new ops will get through. Close all DX clusters for Topband; yeah ha
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00091.html (8,943 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:59:03 -0600
Or move to the new Topband....500Khz.... Cecil K5DL _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00093.html (8,416 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:02:01 -0800
Exactly. For those that missed it - there is more here: http://www.arrl.org/news/world-radiocommunication-conference-2012-begins-today-in-switzerland-will-consider-secondary-mf-amat Tree N6TR _______
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00094.html (9,431 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:04:19 -0700
Can only imagine how big the loading coil for my 40' vertical would need to be for 500 kHz operations. Hi Hi _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00096.html (10,189 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: Jack/W6NF <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:28:33 -0800
But, then, at 5w EIRP I guess the playing field is level. You just have to work on your receive antenna! -- Jack, W6NF Silver Springs, NV DM09ji _______________________________________________ UR RST
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00097.html (10,480 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: Jack/W6NF <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:13:23 -0800
You should see the loading coil used at the Fallon LORAN station! At least the diameter if a 55 gallon drum to match the 600-foot vertical. Quite impressive. -- Jack, W6NF Silver Springs, NV DM09ji _
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00103.html (12,186 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:58:17 -0600
Boy, you said it! That is exactly how it is. How many really competent engineers, doctors, amateurs, auto mechanics, teachers, machinists, you-name-it are really good at what they do? Not that many,
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00125.html (9,615 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:26:11 -0500
In truth, exactly 50% of the people on this earth are below average - not most. Still that's a sobering thought for anyone who expects average and bases expectations on average. 73, ... Joe, W4TV __
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00129.html (10,602 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Woods <jmwooods@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:40:36 -0800 (PST)
We have a winner.... I have noticed this correlation with cluster spots and unsportsmanlike conduct as well: In the CQ160 contest last month, EA5RS was calling CQ.  I found him on a routine sweep of
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00134.html (10,790 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:50:24 -0500
Ive seen a few that use copper tubing wrapped around a 55 gallon plastic drum and a 30-40' vertical element! Im running a top loaded T supported off the side of the 180' tower and elevated radials. C
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00138.html (11,865 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:30:52 -0600
A trivial point in this discussion, but of some consequence in assessment of data, the average is almost always NOT the 50% point of a population. The Median is the midpoint -- that is 50% of the pop
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00141.html (10,354 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:27:11 -0700
I think your take - knowing what the distribution is - is a worthy consideration, Tod. Using a technique called Bernard's approximation and given, oh, six to ten data points, and some graphing paper
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00150.html (12,636 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:23:51 -0500
Ooooooooo... I smell a lot of kit building in the future! Gary - KA1J _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00164.html (9,839 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu