Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+QRP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+QRP\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: QRP (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 16:05:35 -0800; I started with radials elevated only about 4 ft. N6BT's advice to me was to get them up to at least 18 ft. Higher is better. I'd do what I could to make them less visible to your XYL -- smaller diame; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00173.html (9,036 bytes)
22. Re: Topband: QRP (score: 1): Author: "Hardy Landskov" <n7rt@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 18:11:02 -0700; Bob, I ran the same thing for years here in AZ with great results. 4 elevated radials at 12 feet, Each was 132 feet long. Worked 237 countries. Hardy N7RT --Original Message-- From: Topband [mailto:t; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00175.html (10,533 bytes)
23. Re: Topband: QRP (score: 1): Author: "Steve Ireland" <vk6vz@arach.net.au>; Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:18:42 +0800; G'day What has happened to the topband conditions the last couple of decades? As a topbander from 1969 (first as an SWL and then licenced as G3ZZD in February 1971, running 9W DC input to a 5763) I'd; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00176.html (10,166 bytes)
24. Re: Topband: QRP (score: 1): Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:30:15 -0800; Hardy, Wow, that is great results ! I am anxious to get mine up. It has been raining a lot here in northern CA and I am doing the antenna work sporadically on dryer days. Thanks for sharing your resu; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00178.html (11,213 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 24
Page: [1] [2]