Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+QRP\s+Dx\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+QRP\s+Dx\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: QRP DX (score: 1): Author: r.negro@lombardiacom.it (Riccardo Negro); Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 20:22:35 +0200; Hi all, after many years of HF 100W activity I have become a 100% QRP operator = (FT 817) with good results (QRP-WAS, 150 QRP-DXCC in less than 2 years = and with just a rotary delta loop + dipole).; /archives//html/Topband/2002-06/msg00059.html (7,768 bytes)
2. Topband: QRP DX (score: 1): Author: kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com (KN4LF, T. F. Giella); Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 10:33:51 +0100; Riccardo Asked: I would appreciate very much if QRP operators would share their experience about typical DX activity on 160 at QRP level (DXCC, WAC, Europe-US contacts, contest placement, etc.). Thom; /archives//html/Topband/2002-06/msg00063.html (7,822 bytes)
3. Topband: QRP DX (score: 1): Author: K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com (K9AY); Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 11:58:30 -0400; -- I have operated 7 or 8 160M contests at 5 watts, as well as DX contests with QSOs on 160. All but one was done with either a shunt-fed 75 ft. tower on a city lot, or an inverted-L of the same hei; /archives//html/Topband/2002-06/msg00064.html (8,377 bytes)
4. Topband: QRP DX (score: 1): Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 02:58:00 +0100; Hi Riccardo, Several years ago, there was a good opening between Southern California and Europe on 160 meters. Robin, WA6CDR was operating from Mt. Wilson (5000 feet above sea level) and was able to; /archives//html/Topband/2002-06/msg00066.html (7,993 bytes)
5. Topband: QRP DX (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 08:27:27 -0400; In the 60's mid-west stations could work G's who were running only 5 or 10 watts, and the USA stations were running 100 watts or so by law. It took very good conditions, because we did not have packe; /archives//html/Topband/2002-06/msg00068.html (7,842 bytes)
6. Topband: QRP Dx (score: 1): Author: SteamBoilers@aol.com (SteamBoilers@aol.com); Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 15:28:20 EDT; Hello Gents The U.K. had a legal input power of ten watts for years, with a typical pre crystal filter receiver and a back garden sixty feet long contacts with north and south America could be made m; /archives//html/Topband/2002-06/msg00072.html (7,061 bytes)
7. Topband: QRP DX (score: 1): Author: ap231@freenet.carleton.ca (Robert Kavanagh); Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 17:56:28 -0400; I was running about 20 watts input to an 807. As I recall, the antenna was an end-fed wire about 100 feet long and about 20 feet above the ground. Of course, it's not so hard to work EU from NB and 1; /archives//html/Topband/2002-06/msg00074.html (7,503 bytes)
8. TopBand: QRP DX (score: 1): Author: thefarm@bellatlantic.net (Howell Farm); Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 08:10:00 -0500; Hello topbanders, This blustery AM I worked VK6HD with 5 watts from New Jersey. Let that be a challenge to folks to reduce power in the Stew Perry. This contact was the same distance as the longest h; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00205.html (6,616 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]