Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Question\s+\-\s+optimum\s+number\s+of\s+radials\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Question - optimum number of radials (score: 1)
Author: DALE LONG <dale.long@prodigy.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:12:42 -0800 (PST)
I understand that 120 radials is the golden standard.  At what point is there no significant improvement? How much worse is 60 radials?  How much worse is 24 radials (4 of 1/4 lambda and 20 or 1/10 l
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00199.html (8,822 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:18:14 -0600
w0btu.com/Optimum_number_of_ground_radials_vs_radial_length.html Check the links on that page to N6LF, Rudy Severns' pages. His work has been called the gold standard of radial science. 73, Mike www.
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00200.html (8,906 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:26:14 -0500
N6LF has done quite a bit of actual testing of various in ground and elevated radial systems. See: http://www.antennasbyn6lf.com/ K3LC has done extensive modeling of both in ground and elevated radia
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00201.html (9,352 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:49:47 -0500
I understand that 120 radials is the golden standard. At what point is there no significant improvement?>>> 120 radials never was a gold standard. The FCC said if a AM BC station uses something like
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00204.html (9,564 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials (score: 1)
Author: Brad Rehm <bradrehm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:11:26 -0600
Jerry Sevick, W2FMI, has an interesting comment about the "120" number in his book, "The Short Vertical Antenna and Ground Radial." At the end of the first chapter he notes: "...it should be mentione
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00205.html (10,832 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:39:11 -0500
Jerry Sevick, W2FMI, has an interesting comment about the "120" number in his book, "The Short Vertical Antenna and Ground Radial." At the end of the first chapter he notes: "...it should be mentione
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00206.html (11,215 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials (score: 1)
Author: Dan Maguire <djm2150@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:18:13 -0800 (PST)
For anyone interested in modeling a vertical with a variable number of radials you might refer back to this post: http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/Topband/2013-04/msg00017.html Near the bot
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00207.html (7,603 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Fry" <rfry@adams.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:00:00 -0600
The r-f loss at the operating frequency in a set of buried radials varies with the conductivity and permittivity of the earth in which they are buried. The NEC4.2 study below shows that for poor eart
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00209.html (9,699 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:15:59 -0500
That's a lot of good information, Richard! Thanks for sharing! 73, Charlie, K4OTV The r-f loss at the operating frequency in a set of buried radials varies with the conductivity and permittivity of t
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00210.html (10,030 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials (score: 1)
Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:02:08 -0500
73, Charlie, K4OTV The whole topic of radials as it applies to me on my small lot is "put in as many as you can". The same probably applies to others on small lots. On top band I do not have room in
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00211.html (9,384 bytes)

11. Topband: Question - optimum number of radials (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:41:35 -0700
Besides "optimim number(s)," I wonder if there is supporting analysis for the connection of the radial ends?? I have around 80 elevated radials that range from 50 foot lengths, running east and west,
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00212.html (8,422 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:45:58 -0500
While Tom touched on the subject yesterday the subject of an individuals ground conductivity has to be stressed, continuously it seems. The FCC maps arent perfect and hams usually dont have the optio
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00213.html (10,235 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:54:41 -0500
Hi, Bill Well, like you, I also live on a fairly small city lot with way too much bedrock coming up to the surface and a long concrete driveway, so buried radials just aren't feasible for me! So I hu
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00215.html (10,486 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:00:36 -0500
Yeah, just a few elevated resonant radials can work wonders as you have discovered, Carl! And rock does get in the way of buried radials!! The models teach that elevated resonant radials should work
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00216.html (11,105 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu