Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+RG6\s+recommendations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+RG6\s+recommendations\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: RG6 recommendations (score: 1): Author: Charles Stackhouse via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 01:32:35 +0000 (UTC); After a period of inactivity, I set out to get my station going again. The Beverages were not working with very low signal levels and I replaced 600 foot RG6 feedline from shack to Beverage switch in; /archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00211.html (8,157 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: RG6 recommendations (score: 1): Author: John Kaufmann via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 21:07:55 -0500; Hi Charlie, What you see in your TDR sweep of the RG6 is absolutely normal. I've seen exactly the same thing. The rise in apparent impedance with distance is caused by the loss in the cable. If you h; /archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00212.html (9,383 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: RG6 recommendations (score: 1): Author: "Lloyd - N9LB" <lloydberg@tds.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 21:00:42 -0600; Did you re-calibrate your analyzer for 75 ohms? ( rather than 50 ohms ) If no re-cal, then what you see is normal. 73 Lloyd - N9LB After a period of inactivity, I set out to get my station going agai; /archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00213.html (8,786 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]