Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+RHR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+RHR\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: RHR (score: 1): Author: HAROLD SMITH JR <w0rihps@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 19:15:14 -0800; Good evening All. If someone wants to do it this way, well why not. I am on the top of the Honor-Roll 379 confrmd and all were worked within a 15 mile area. I have 192 confirmed on 160. DXCC on 7 Ban; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00139.html (7,039 bytes)
2. Topband: RHR (score: 1): Author: Ron Spencer <ron.e.spencer@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:07:03 -0500; I don't get it. WHY do you care? How does what the operators that use them do affect you? How does it affect your ability to work a station? What possible difference does it make in how you use this; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00352.html (7,371 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: RHR (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:17:28 -0600; Very well said indeed, Ron! 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00355.html (7,711 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: RHR (score: 1): Author: James Bennett <w6jhb@me.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:39:37 -0800; Well, if I work 100 countries using a low antenna and QRP, I'm proud of hanging that DXCC certificate on my wall, and telling any guest in my shack how I got it. How about if ARRL just issues a DXCC; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00357.html (8,492 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: RHR (score: 1): Author: GALE STEWARD via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 21:58:19 +0000 (UTC); I'm with Ron one this. I don't care in the slightest what someone else uses to work a station. If it's legal, go for it. I worked my 146 on Topband from my own QTH. My station is always going forward; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00374.html (9,227 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: RHR (score: 1): Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 17:42:24 -0500; I guess that about sums it up from an intelligent person. Ron we took the hard to swallow pill a few times in our careers. Like you mentioned, incentive licensing and the dropping of the code when we; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00375.html (9,420 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: RHR (score: 1): Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 09:22:23 -0500; Just wondering what provisions have been made if a drunk operator gets on the remote station and wreaks havoc or if a remote transmitter malfunctions and starts spewing garbage? 73, Roger N1RJ ______; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00518.html (7,278 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: RHR (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baughn" <baughn@centurylink.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 09:26:13 -0500; I thought the moderator had asked that we move on from this topic. Steve, WD8NPL Just wondering what provisions have been made if a drunk operator gets on the remote station and wreaks havoc or if a; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00520.html (7,950 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]