Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+RX\s+antenna\s+transformer\s+winding\s+\(pure\s+resistance\s+transformation\s+issues\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: RX antenna transformer winding (pure resistance transformation issues) (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:06:58 -0400
Digging back through the archives I found lots of discussion about the "best" transformer to use with flags, pennants and beverages. The discussions included material type, and style (toroid vs. bino
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00221.html (9,090 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: RX antenna transformer winding (pure resistance transformation issues) (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:11:06 -0700
discussions included material type, and style (toroid vs. binocular), but I found no mention about problems regarding the use of conventional toroid cores in which a pure resistive load on the secon
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00222.html (7,818 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: RX antenna transformer winding (pure resistance transformation issues) (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:31:45 -0400
I had additional offline conversations with Rick (N6RK), and Carl (KM1H), and below is my official response to my original post about RX antenna transformer windings and complex impedance measured on
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00235.html (9,487 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: RX antenna transformer winding (pure resistance transformation issues) (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:36:25 -0500
If I can add my $0.02 worth here... I have never found a better ferrite core for RX antenna transformers than the Amidon BN-73-202 (Fair-Rite 2873000202). I also used to use side-by-side stacked ferr
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00236.html (8,702 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: RX antenna transformer winding (pure resistance transformation issues) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:56:18 -0700
One missing piece in understanding what you're seeing is the fact that mu (permeability) is a complex number, u' +ju'', where u' represents the inductive component and u'' represents the loss compone
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00237.html (9,372 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: RX antenna transformer winding (pure resistance transformation issues) (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:00:58 -0400
I had additional offline conversations with Rick (N6RK), and Carl (KM1H), and below is my official response to my original post about RX antenna transformer windings and complex impedance measured on
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00238.html (11,059 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: RX antenna transformer winding (pure resistance transformation issues) (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:38:12 -0500
That is for sure. I was following a thread in an SWL or AM BCB group a few months ago, where someone (right or wrong) was recommending a toroid as an antenna in lieu of a ferrite rod with wire wrappe
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00239.html (9,192 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: RX antenna transformer winding (pure resistance transformation issues) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:15:22 -0700
So-called "self-shielding" and it's inverse, leakage flux, also depend on permeability, which in turn depends on the material and the frequency of interest. Fair-Rite data sheets for their materials
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00242.html (9,388 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu