Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Radial\s+length\s+responses\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Radial\s+length\s+responses\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Radial length responses (score: 1): Author: epetek1@att.net; Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:49:05 +0000; Several have asked for a summary of the responses to my earlier posting asking whether adjusting radial length was a way of trimming an inverted L for resonance on 160. Many opinions but probably the; /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00279.html (7,387 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Radial length responses (score: 1): Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:02:51 -0500; BTW, Pete-- I disagree with your summation about adversely affecting the radiation angle when making an adjustment to the radials that is relatively small. Also see the work done by K5IU, published i; /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00289.html (9,986 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]