Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Re\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FT1000MP\s+click\s+reduction\s+\-\s+CORRECTION\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Re\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FT1000MP\s+click\s+reduction\s+\-\s+CORRECTION\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Re: [CQ-Contest] FT1000MP click reduction - CORRECTION (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 07:11:59 -0400; N4ZR replied: Too much time looking at surface mount boards! C2148 is the correct capacitor to change. C2148 is a tiny .0047uF chip near T2018. I soldered a .1 uF chip directly across it, but a leade; /archives//html/Topband/2001-05/msg00053.html (7,736 bytes)
2. Topband: Re: [CQ-Contest] FT1000MP click reduction - CORRECTION (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 08:51:51 -0700; "C2148 is the correct capacitor to change. C2148 is a tiny .0047uF chip near T2018." == My schematic shows that C2148 is a .01uF capacitor. Is it possible that Yaesu changed this value from .0047uF o; /archives//html/Topband/2001-05/msg00057.html (7,105 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]