Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Re\:\s+\[TowerTalk\]\s+0\.025\s+Wavelength\s+Tall\s+Vertical\-\-6\s+dB\s+Gain\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Re: [TowerTalk] 0.025 Wavelength Tall Vertical--6 dB Gain! (score: 1)
Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein K0HA)
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 23:42:47 -0700
73, Bill K0HA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@contesting.com Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-topband@contesting.com
/archives//html/Topband/1999-04/msg00051.html (7,605 bytes)

2. Topband: Re: [TowerTalk] 0.025 Wavelength Tall Vertical--6 dB Gain! (score: 1)
Author: ronc@sonic.net (Ron Castro)
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 21:09:11 -0700
More on the Crossed-Field Antenna is available at http://www.antennex.com/ . To get the full scoop you have to subscribe (that makes me a little suspicious right off the bat!), but they have construc
/archives//html/Topband/1999-04/msg00052.html (8,020 bytes)

3. Topband: Re: [TowerTalk] 0.025 Wavelength Tall Vertical--6 dB Gain! (score: 1)
Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 07:14:46 -0400 (EDT)
Actually, the CFA reported in the journal is a serious offering, although at present the theory behind it and the ability to replicate or model the antenna are under serious discussion among a number
/archives//html/Topband/1999-04/msg00053.html (8,889 bytes)

4. Topband: Re: [TowerTalk] 0.025 Wavelength Tall Vertical--6 dB Gain! (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 04:08:02 -0400
Hi Bill, Don't be sucked in by this crap....... This stuff all died a few years ago when it was thoroughly debunked as pure fantasy. It has recently been resurrected by a W5 who wrote an article on s
/archives//html/Topband/1999-04/msg00055.html (8,105 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu