Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Re\:\s+Folded\s+Unipole\s+vs\s+Series\s+Fed\s+Antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Re\:\s+Folded\s+Unipole\s+vs\s+Series\s+Fed\s+Antenna\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Re: Folded Unipole vs Series Fed Antenna (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 16:07:32 -0600; Hi Gary, No, that is one of the neat things about a folded unipole, the sine of the reactance is reversed from that of a series fed antenna element. The short folded unipole can be viewed as being a; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00142.html (7,596 bytes)
2. Topband: Re: Folded Unipole vs Series Fed Antenna (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 20:17:39 -0500; But........ keep in mind it is generally much less efficient for the same height than a conventional base loaded vertical with inductor loading unless you use very large conductors for the hairpin a; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00146.html (9,425 bytes)
3. Topband: Re: Folded Unipole vs Series Fed Antenna (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 08:57:34 -0600; "A shortened hairpin monopole is never as efficient as a reasonably well constructed top-hat loaded antenna of the same height..." Of course, you can have the best of both worlds: a shortened hairpin; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00160.html (7,506 bytes)
4. Topband: Re: Folded Unipole vs Series Fed Antenna (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 10:31:23 -0800; "Mauri, Some years ago I feed a 100 foot tower (with 20 meter 4 element monobander) by running the feed wire inside the tower. (From the rotor plate to ground as I was in to much of a hurry to mount; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00247.html (8,640 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]