- 1. Topband: Re: topband RX (score: 1)
- Author: dhaupt@bewellnet.com (dhaupt@bewellnet.com)
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 16:37:54 +0000
- Actually, given the number of emails we have seen recently about flags, pennants, loops and other negative gain receive antennas, it is surprising that anybody would question using a sensitive receiv
- /archives//html/Topband/2000-08/msg00094.html (7,989 bytes)
- 2. Topband: Re: topband RX (score: 1)
- Author: w8ji@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 10:08:48 -0400
- I use push-pull CATV bipolar transistors in preamps, and the minimum gain necessary to work with my least sensitive receiver. One way you can test a system is to switch from the antenna to a dummy l
- /archives//html/Topband/2000-08/msg00098.html (8,605 bytes)
- 3. Topband: Re: topband RX (score: 1)
- Author: fkamp@home.com (fkamp)
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 13:54:36 -0500
- I have been following the messages on receivers. I would like to thank all those who have posted on this topic. All the information was very good (at least I thought so). Good enough to deserve a spe
- /archives//html/Topband/2000-08/msg00101.html (7,738 bytes)
- 4. Topband: Re: topband RX (score: 1)
- Author: w7iuv@earthlink.net (Larry Molitor)
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 21:58:22 +0100
- Tom, This appears to be an excellent solution to the preamp part of the problem. I have had great success with the single-ended CATV preamp I've used for the last twenty years or so, but would like t
- /archives//html/Topband/2000-08/msg00103.html (7,468 bytes)
- 5. Topband: Re: topband RX (score: 1)
- Author: w7iuv@earthlink.net (Larry Molitor)
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 22:21:08 +0100
- A question for those more versed in communication theory than myself: Through the years I have tried, in vain, to correlate receiver test bench data with on-the-air performance. I guess that personal
- /archives//html/Topband/2000-08/msg00104.html (8,017 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu