- 1. Topband: Re Asian Jammer.. (score: 1)
- Author: "robert briggs" <vk3zl@bigpond.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:02:37 +1000
- I find it very annoying to be subjected to this "new" interference so casually inflicted upon 160 meter ham's world wide.As it is we have to tolerate random fishnet beacons and broadcast birdies all
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00224.html (7,084 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: Re Asian Jammer.. (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Marshall-Read <rmread@starhub.net.sg>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:41:18 +0800 (SGT)
- Snip... "If it is to become a permanent fixture then I guess a lot of operators will lose interest in the band......" My feelings exactly. There must be a way to stop this, the JARL is supposedly try
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00232.html (7,748 bytes)
- 3. Topband: Re Asian Jammer.. (score: 1)
- Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 04:56:25 +0000
- VK3ZL lamented: This now makes the 4th band or good chunk of band we have lost to what looks like mainland Chinese intruders. Bob may not realize it, but he has hit upon an angle that should be pursu
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00234.html (8,017 bytes)
- 4. Topband: Re Asian Jammer.. (score: 1)
- Author: "Ken Claerbout" <K4ZW@Staffnet.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 05:23:20 -0400
- Another causality of the mess: Hi Ken, Here is on 160 meters very heavy QRM too. Also his harmonics on 80 meters. Maybe it is from Manchuria (BY, near UA-BY-JT border), or P5. UA0MF reported QRM too
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00237.html (6,938 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: Re Asian Jammer.. (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:27:10 -0400
- dictatorship that in some ways looks more and more like the mob in P5? The first goal should be to not be an angry mob ourselves and actually determine where it comes from with some reasonable certa
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00246.html (7,791 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu