Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Receive\s+Splitter\s+or\s+Not\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Receive Splitter or Not? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Murray <adkmurray@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
Hello All, When bringing in a receive antenna to two receivers is it necessary to have some kind of splitter with isolation?  I just built a box with a T configuration using rca jacks.  I've looked a
/archives//html/Topband/2009-03/msg00068.html (6,742 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Receive Splitter or Not? (score: 1)
Author: Peter <pc2a@pi4cc.nl>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:09:38 +0000
Jim Murray schreef: Jim, Have a look here: http://www.bavarian-contest-club.de/projects/misc_projects/splitter.pdf Easy, spimple and cheap! Peter PC2A www.pi4cc.nl ___________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2009-03/msg00069.html (7,927 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Receive Splitter or Not? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:44:23 -0400
It depends ... (helpful answer, right?). For example, I have had various SDRs connected to the RX antenna loop on my two transceivers. One of them did not load the RX inputs at all, while my current
/archives//html/Topband/2009-03/msg00070.html (8,281 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Receive Splitter or Not? (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry-Laptop" <telwest@telusplanet.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:36:59 -0600
Hello All, When bringing in a receive antenna to two receivers is it necessary to have some kind of splitter with isolation? I just built a box with a T configuration using rca jacks. I've looked aro
/archives//html/Topband/2009-03/msg00071.html (7,686 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Receive Splitter or Not? (score: 1)
Author: Sam Morgan <ka5oai@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:43:18 -0500
here's hoping you meant: I've *used* ..... not sued, heheheeh. -- GB & 73 KA5OAI Sam Morgan _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/Topband/2009-03/msg00072.html (7,684 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Receive Splitter or Not? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:03:58 -0700
necessary to have some kind of splitter with isolation? There are two reasons why one might want a passive splitter with isolation. First, and least important, is impedance matching. Second, and most
/archives//html/Topband/2009-03/msg00073.html (8,856 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Receive Splitter or Not? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
/archives//html/Topband/2009-03/msg00077.html (8,860 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Receive Splitter or Not? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:44:04 -0700
YES! Thanks for filling in for my omission of that important fact. Like all passive networks, its behavior depends on source and load impedances. 73, Jim K9YC ________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2009-03/msg00078.html (7,822 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu