Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Receiver\s+recommendations\,\s+please\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Receiver\s+recommendations\,\s+please\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Receiver recommendations, please! (score: 1): Author: Aidehua@aol.com (Aidehua@aol.com); Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 12:48:48 EST; I have more receivers than I know what to do with! I am particularly fond of Collins and Drake. Am thinking about having my Drake R4C modified by Sherwood. With an Icom 775, am I going to appreciate; /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00216.html (7,300 bytes)
2. Topband: Receiver recommendations, please! (score: 1): Author: 4x4nj@iname.com (R. Kline); Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 21:49:03 -0000; The Drake R4C is a wonderful receiver. I used one exclusively from 1974 until 1998. The biggest problem with the receiver was the slowly advancing aging of the RF coils with a gradual deterioration o; /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00219.html (9,090 bytes)
3. Topband: Receiver recommendations, please! (score: 1): Author: k6xt@arrl.net (Art Charette); Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 23:03:25 -0800; I think you'll be happier with the 775. The R4C has relatively low dynamic range and TOI compared to today's transceivers. Get competitive with it (ie, contesting) and it'll fold early. But, has real; /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00223.html (8,974 bytes)
4. Topband: Receiver recommendations, please! (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:25:57 -0500; Hi All, I owned a brand new 775DSP one year ago. Your mileage may vary, and I don't intend to start a long thread, but anyone with a 775DSP should carefully check for spurious emissions caused by the; /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00234.html (8,545 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]