Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Receiving\s+loop\s+worked\s+great\s+in\s+Stew\s+Perry\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Receiving loop worked great in Stew Perry (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:30:56 -0800
In rebuilding the station this year, I have been trying a lot of receiving antennas. My criterion was: does this receive significantly better than the transmit vertical. I tried some beverages withou
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00004.html (7,992 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Receiving loop worked great in Stew Perry (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 13:04:28 -0500
If you have nasty and persistent local Electical noise ie from arcing insulators and nearby electrical crud from devices and a constant s9 or strong noise floor the mag loop will work wonders only be
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00009.html (9,740 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Receiving loop worked great in Stew Perry (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 07:24:40 -0800
Here is a link to the NCJ article describing the loop: http://www.n6rk.com/loopantennas/NCJ_loop_antenna_N6RK.pdf Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ Stew Perry Topband Distance
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00016.html (7,180 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Receiving loop worked great in Stew Perry (score: 1)
Author: cris blak <cyo3fff@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 08:23:03 -0800 (PST)
Hello Rick, I've tried also a K9AY such loop on the past SP contest and was a good improvement over my INV-L. I never heard before CE1/K7CA and south american DX stations. An A/B test were "all to no
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00046.html (8,554 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu