Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Remote\s+receiver\s+deafness\.\s+Was\:\s+New\s+Modes\,\s+Systems\,\s+etc\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Remote receiver deafness. Was: New Modes, Systems, etc (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 19:56:14 -0500
I had private correspondence about this, so here is additional information. Some of these remote receivers do have 'bad' antennas, others not so. For 'local' reception, one does not need much. I have
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00182.html (7,877 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Remote receiver deafness. Was: New Modes, Systems, etc (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 20:04:20 -0500
On and off I have had a Web SDR available to some. To back up with Vince is saying, it is often on a 'left over antenna', or mh HF6V. Good enough for 40 and up and certainly not good enough for 80 or
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00183.html (9,449 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Remote receiver deafness. Was: New Modes, Systems, etc (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 18:45:52 -0700
When I had my skimmer going, I would use my R8 on 80 and 160.  I was shocked at some of the DX it spotted on 160 and 80. To back up with Vince is saying, it is often on a 'left over antenna', or mh H
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00184.html (9,761 bytes)

4. Topband: Remote receiver deafness. Was: New Modes, Systems, etc (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 21:46:24 -0500
Some actual data from my 'deaf' receiver. WSPR on 2200M: 2020-01-02 03:12 K5DNL 0.137491 -21 -1 EM15lj 5 VA3VF FN25 2163 52 2019-12-31 03:16 NO3M 0.137520 -24 0 EN91wr 1 VA3VF FN25 584 43 2019-12-31
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00186.html (9,771 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu