Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Rogers\s+dipole\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Rogers\s+dipole\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Rogers dipole (score: 1): Author: Richard McLachlan <richard@rodsley.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 20:06:23 +0000; Rogers dipole certainly seems to work. From time to time when everybody here in the U.K. is busily CQIng with no response from NA, I listen on an East Coast NA web SDR and compare signals from this e; /archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00151.html (6,445 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Rogers dipole (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:20:52 -0500; I dont at all doubt Rogers reports. The grind comes when others attempting Roger's successful methods report terrible results. There is clearly something going on not at all well understood. There ar; /archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00168.html (13,730 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Rogers dipole (score: 1): Author: "FZ Bruce" <k1fz@twc.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 17:13:11 +0000; Hi Guy, Some of it is high ground penetration on low frequencies. Dipole height above 'real conducting' ground can be a lot in some locations 73Bruce-K1FZ I dont at all doubt Rogers reports. The grin; /archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00169.html (14,899 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]