- 1. Topband: S9SS (score: 1)
- Author: stcohen at erols.com (Susan and Ted Cohen)
- Date: Sat Feb 8 12:17:07 2003
- If you've ever wondered what Charles has to put up with at his QTH regarding interference from nearby broadcasters, you will want to visit S50U's web site. Once there, click on S9SS LOG SEARCH and th
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-02/msg00046.html (6,534 bytes)
- 2. Topband: S9SS (score: 1)
- Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
- Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 17:38:50 -0400
- Many of us worked Charles KY4P as S92SS several years ago. He's an engineer with VOA, recently returned to Sao Tome and now is once again active as S9SS on Topband. Read Charles's story here... http:
- /archives//html/Topband/2002-10/msg00020.html (6,877 bytes)
- 3. Topband: S9SS (score: 1)
- Author: W2pm@aol.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>)
- Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 12:22:25 -0500
- Heard S9SS on 80 - S9 plus 10 on the NE mini Flag for over 45 minutes. Then he QRT'd and went to 160 where I could barely detect he was in there - despite posts that he was very strong in NA - mostly
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00181.html (6,458 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: S9SS (score: 1)
- Author: BobK8IA@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:02:04 EST
- Thats interesting as he was quite copyable here in Arizona on both bands, 0230Z or so. Nothing fancy here for antennas (rx or tx) on either band, just low noise level most of the time. Thats certainl
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00183.html (7,340 bytes)
- 5. Topband: S9SS (score: 1)
- Author: "ARNE GJERNING" <gjerning@flash.net>
- Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:37:01 -0700
- GREAT opening Saturday early evening. I spent over 30 minutes calling S9SS on 80 CW to work him. On 160M it took 3 calls to get him in the log. He was an honest S6-S8 on the S-Meter here in NM for ov
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00185.html (7,004 bytes)
- 6. Re: Topband: S9SS (score: 1)
- Author: W2pm@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 20:06:19 EST
- I dont know -- Im starting to think it's one of two things here at my QTH in suburban NNJ -- 1. local terrain with high density development attenuates low angle signals - I know the noise level is sh
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00186.html (7,603 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu