Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+SDR\s+Mythbusters\s+\-\s+ADC\s+Overload\s+myths\s+debunked\.\.\.\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: SDR Mythbusters - ADC Overload myths debunked... (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 05:56:26 -0600
As with any technological change, there are many myths, past truths or part truths that get repeated endlessly and out of context by those frightened or challenged by the change. Software defined ra
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00017.html (9,585 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: SDR Mythbusters - ADC Overload myths debunked... (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:29:09 -0400
From Stu, K6TU As with any technological change, there are many myths, past truths or part truths that get repeated endlessly and out of context by those frightened or challenged by the change. Softw
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00020.html (9,677 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: SDR Mythbusters - ADC Overload myths debunked... (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 16:43:12 -0600
His "explanation," if I read it correctly, seems to be a tad "at odds" with what Sherwood Engineering's measurements show....or am I missing it???? _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00021.html (9,805 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: SDR Mythbusters - ADC Overload myths debunked... (score: 1)
Author: W5JR Mike <w5jr.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 19:05:11 -0400
Interesting. Here at my place - wires in the trees, I'm able to transmit on the K3 (100w, old SYN) within about 20 kHz of the frequency where the Flex 6300 (zero band filtering radio) is listening wi
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00022.html (11,078 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: SDR Mythbusters - ADC Overload myths debunked... (score: 1)
Author: MU 4CX250B <4cx250b@miamioh.edu>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 17:07:02 -0600
Seems to me the devil is in the details. Obviously, if you pump enough RF power into the input of any SDR (e.g., 100W), eventually it is going to collapse. If the ADC can handle a few volts, that sho
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00023.html (10,650 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: SDR Mythbusters - ADC Overload myths debunked... (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:30:04 -0500
I bought a partially-assembled SDR kit a few years ago. It's an older Softrock Xtall Lite 9.0 with the optional electronically-switched BPF, designed by Tony Parks. Well under $100 for the kit. I jus
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00024.html (9,143 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: SDR Mythbusters - ADC Overload myths debunked... (score: 1)
Author: W5JR Mike <w5jr.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 00:28:20 -0400
Mike, what version of SSDR is he running? I believe the current 1.5 release has a reported issue on transmit with some (all?) 6300's. I understand a point release is being readied to address that. I
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00027.html (10,305 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: SDR Mythbusters - ADC Overload myths debunked... (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:10:56 -0700
Steve Hicks, N5AC and the VP of Engineering at FlexRadio has posted an excellent explanation and bust of the ADC overload myth on the FlexRadio community. You dont need to be registered on the commun
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00046.html (12,990 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: SDR Mythbusters - ADC Overload myths debunked... (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 03:37:15 -0400
I have no experience with Flex Radio equipment, (it might be great stuff for all I know), so I will confine my comments to the theory discussed in the "ADC overload myths debunked" paper. A lot of wh
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00047.html (8,947 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: SDR Mythbusters - ADC Overload myths debunked... (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 05:58:38 -0600
I'm not an RF engineer so any "direction" or "stay inside these boundaries, Dood" assistance is appreciated! However, as a Systems Engineer with a background in statistics, I missed the "what?" facto
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00048.html (15,938 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: SDR Mythbusters - ADC Overload myths debunked... (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 08:19:43 -0400
The opinion expressed in the Flexradio editorial about noise blankers being completely harmless, is not an opinion, it is even false. What Flexradio says: ""With a noise blanker, we remove thousands
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00049.html (14,303 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: SDR Mythbusters - ADC Overload myths debunked... (score: 1)
Author: "JC" <n4is@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:09:46 -0400
Hi guys I would like to add my 2 cents on this matter. If you not good, or a very good, RF engineer it is hard to understand what DDU/DUC radio do for you. The most important thing, DDC/DUC radios ar
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00050.html (11,030 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: SDR Mythbusters - ADC Overload myths debunked... (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:55:01 -0400
The opinion expressed in the Flexradio editorial about noise blankers being completely harmless, is not an opinion, it is even false. It really isn't an accurate or factual technical article. It is a
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00051.html (11,090 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu