Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+SERIOUS\s+coax\s+choke\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+SERIOUS\s+coax\s+choke\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: SERIOUS coax choke (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:35:33 -0800; Yes, it should go at the feedpoint. If the feedline is long, you might want another one further along the line so that it doesn't interact with other antennas. Yes, the intent is to isolate the feedl; /archives//html/Topband/2008-11/msg00138.html (7,707 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: SERIOUS coax choke (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:30:43 -0800; Because the wire in question is long enough to behave as an antenna at some frequencies of interest. The portion of the coax betwen the choke and the intentional RX antenna will act as a separate ant; /archives//html/Topband/2008-11/msg00148.html (9,546 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: SERIOUS coax choke (score: 1): Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:08:20 -0600; First, I'll assume that you have a transformer with separate primary and secondary windings, with separate grounds. This provides common-mode isolation between antenna and feedline. Re-radiation from; /archives//html/Topband/2008-11/msg00151.html (7,957 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]