Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Sloper\s+debate\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Sloper\s+debate\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Sloper debate (score: 1): Author: "Greg - ZL3IX" <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>; Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 17:45:14 +1300; Why Greg? A 1/4 wl slopper isn't much different than an inverted V. The slopper has as much current into the tower at the feedpoint as it does in the thing people call the antenna. Exactly, and that'; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00064.html (8,221 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Sloper debate (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 06:47:46 -0500; Hi Greg, There's no reason to get into a debate about a subjective thing about the definition of better. The most important thing is to have the feed system not burn other things up!! As long as peo; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00068.html (7,822 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]