Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Small\s+Loop\s+does\s+not\s+receive\s+weak\s+signal\s+on\s+160m\s+BOUVET\s+RX\s+SPOILER\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: "JC" <n4is@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 20:46:09 -0500
Hi topband lovers Some friends contact me with deep concerns about the next Bouvet DX expedition receiver antenna called SALAD <http://www.lz1aq.signacor.com/docs/active-wideband-directional-antenna.
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00116.html (19,964 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: <n4is@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:59:50 -0500
Doug NX4D asked me to add his comments, Hey JC and Topbanders, This is meant as a suggestion, not a criticism. The reason I sounded an alarm to JC was the concern that the proposed SALAD/ LZ1AQ 160m
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00117.html (7,501 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 19:45:28 -0700
All interesting.  But let me ask (and standby for flames) what is wrong with them simply listening on the TX antenna? I know, I know, conventional wisdom says that you can't possibly work 160 DX with
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00118.html (23,569 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: <n4is@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 23:12:27 -0500
Wes I missed the second question. How a receiving antenna can help on your signal there. The RX antenna is good as the directivity or RDF. Based on my measurements and extensive experiments with the
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00119.html (29,135 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 20:34:56 -0800
I understand Wes's point quite well. I have friends who operate 6M from very remote places where there is no local noise to light up rare grids. They're rare because no one lives there to create nois
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00120.html (9,368 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: <n0tt1@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 23:03:36 -0600
I was one of the 160m ops at "nearby" FT5XO. I can tell you that when the WX was good the TX antennas worked very well for receiving. When the WX turned bad, such as during the snow storm we worked t
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00121.html (28,268 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: David Raymond <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 04:19:43 -0600
This antenna will not be effective on TB regardless of the preamp used.  Hopefully they won't be fighting much noise allowing the TX antenna to hear reasonably well. 73 and Christmas Blessings/Happy
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00122.html (23,911 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 07:38:17 -0700
Rune has kindly spoken up, making some of this discussion moot but I will continue anyway. I appreciate everyone's comments. With respect to Jim's concerns about QRM I have thought about that, but di
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00124.html (11,546 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 11:34:00 -0700
Thanks Charlie for the insight.  I just rewatched the video of your expedition.  Very cool, no pun intended.   Sorry I wasn't a topband guy back then. Just worked you guys on 20 CW and SSB.  I worked
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00125.html (9,190 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 13:38:51 -0600
Yes, the advantages of having good Beverage antennas in addition to an inverted-L are very well established indeed. I (and thousands of other Topbanders) can vouch for that from personal experience.
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00126.html (10,496 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 13:44:10 -0600
You need to drain off the snow static etc. with a resistor in series with a proper RF choke. The values are on this page. And buy the Ohmite resistor specified! :-) https://web.archive.org/web/201811
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00127.html (9,751 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 13:49:40 -0600
Oops! DON'T use an RF choke for a single-wire Beverage. Just the OY 470 ohm resistor to a good RF ground. Sorry. 73 Mike W0BTU _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topban
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00129.html (10,175 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 13:51:23 -0600
All, Kindly direct questions to this group, and not to me privately. TIA. 73 Mike W0BTU _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00130.html (10,164 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 14:18:14 -0700
With all due respect there is an awful lot of presumption here.  Not everyone has the space for one or more Beverage antennas.  I have 1 3/4 acre but the way my vertical, HF tower, house, neighbors'
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00131.html (11,614 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 13:31:26 -0800
Yep. I have 8.5 acres, and it was tricky finding suitable locations for a pair of full-wave reversible 160M Beverages oriented to EU/VK and SA/JA. Feedpoints and terminations of both are at limits of
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00132.html (10,606 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: David Raymond <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 19:25:31 -0600
There's no need for a lot of real estate to get good RX performance.  The Hi-Z three element and four element phased vertical arrays have a small footprint and yield a worthwhile and useful RDF.  The
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00134.html (12,786 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: "GEORGE WALLNER" <aa7jv@atlanticbb.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 10:36:06 -0500
In my experience, a DXpedition does not need an RX antenna on 160 for the first two to three days. During that time they are working the big guns with strong signals. The RX antenna is needed to give
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00137.html (28,712 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 09:44:21 -0700
Thanks for this George. When I posted earlier I said: "Looking at my chances of working 3Y the optimum time is their sunrise (~3:30Z) when I am in complete darkness and straight across the terminator
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00138.html (11,764 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 02:36:05 -0800
I had an interesting experience along these lines back in 2006 for the CQ WW 160 CW contest. Following the lead of K6SE and others, I got permission from the Bureau of Land Management to operate from
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00139.html (30,932 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 15:05:29 -0700
Except you can't buy them now.  From DXE website: Not Available At This Time This product cannot be ordered at this time. Future availability is unknown. We apologize for the inconvenience Wes  N7WS
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00143.html (11,638 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu