- 1. Topband: Snow plus vertical (score: 1)
- Author: "WY7I" <wy7i@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:49:37 -0700
- Hi Topbanders, Here's something that's bugging me, and perhaps a few of you fellow snow-cats can give me some advice. I'm considering a triangle of MA160V's (Cushcraft) along with radial plates on ea
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00135.html (7,060 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: Snow plus vertical (score: 1)
- Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:21:20 -0600
- The extra length at the bottom, between the feedpoint and the radials, will look like part of the antenna. It will move the resonant frequency slightly and the feedpoint impedance a little. It's like
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00136.html (8,360 bytes)
- 3. Topband: Snow plus vertical (score: 1)
- Author: calle.jonsson@sverige.nu
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:20:09 +0100 (CET)
- I have been using several vertical antennas and have never had any problems with snow. Just shovel the area close to the feedpoint or build a "wall" around it. The only problem with verticals in wint
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00140.html (7,625 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: Snow plus vertical (score: 1)
- Author: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:56:44 +0000
- snow-cats can give me some advice. plates on each. The problem is that here in Southern Colorado, we receive about 4-8 feet of snow during the winter. It seems obvious that I can't ground mount the h
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00141.html (8,243 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu