- 1. Re: Topband: Spam:*******, 160M Rhombics (score: 1)
- Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:56:07 -0400
- Tim, A Rhombic for 160 meters would need to be at least 250 feet high on all four support structures to avoid it being a big cloud warmer. Plus having 2 wavelengths on each leg makes this taking up a
- /archives//html/Topband/2013-07/msg00070.html (8,462 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: Spam:*******, 160M Rhombics (score: 1)
- Author: "Lennart M" <lennart.michaelsson@telia.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 19:09:23 +0200
- Hi Herb and all, That is true - if you are not going for a vertically polarized Rhombic where "only" the center support structures need to be tall. However that calls for a very good ground system, n
- /archives//html/Topband/2013-07/msg00071.html (9,895 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu