- 1. Topband: Split frequency working (score: 1)
- Author: "robert briggs" <vk3zl@bigpond.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:35:38 +1100
- I find that split frequency working unnecessary when working my evening Pacific DX. However when I am working Europe in the mornings the pileups are so intense sometimes that split is the only way to
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00149.html (7,455 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: Split frequency working (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:53:13 -0500
- After hearing some recordings of our PJ2T European pileups recorded from the European side during CQWW CW, I'm wondering whether I should set my reservations aside and try split operation during con
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00153.html (8,599 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: Split frequency working (score: 1)
- Author: lew <lew@dsl-only.net>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:35:19 -0800
- Yo TopBanders, Split frequency would be ideal in many situations, but really only works in 2 types of activity: One where you are a desired Big Dog Gun (tm) and can hold a frequency while chaos whirl
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00154.html (7,612 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: Split frequency working (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:03:18 -0500
- There's the problem. No matter where you move the pileup, you can be sure it will impact other people in a very negative way unless you use a really wide split that puts them above 1.850. hundred Hz
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00157.html (8,345 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: Split frequency working (score: 1)
- Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:22:46 +0000
- During my one and only experience as "rare DX" (operating KH6GPQ in the second weekend of the 1975 ARRL CW DX Test), K1GQ taught me that technique for improving my lowband pileup management and QSO r
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00159.html (8,219 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu