Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Spurious\s+Signal\s+on\s+1810\.8\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 04:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
For some while I have been hearing a strong spurious signal on about 1810.8 kHz. I thought it was a local SMPS or similar until I started trying to find it. It is not local to me it - I can hear it o
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00031.html (7,078 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: Bert Barry <bertbarry@xplornet.ca>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 08:42:32 -0400
I thought it was a local SMPS or similar until I started trying to find it. It is not local to me it - I can hear it on several different antenna systems, and also from my remote station 15 km away.
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00034.html (8,042 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:43:50 -0400
For some while I have been hearing a strong spurious signal on about 1810.8 kHz. I thought it was a local SMPS or similar until I started trying to find it. It is not local to me it - I can hear it o
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00035.html (7,985 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: "W1ZC" <W1ZC@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 09:25:15 -0400
I have been hearing the same gnarly signal here in southern NH for a few days or more & thought it was local also but obviously much more wide spread. Very loud here (FN42dr) in early evenings and AM
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00037.html (8,013 bytes)

5. Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
As has been pointed out, I did indeed mean south EAST of me! Interesting that it was not just me that thought it must be local. I can't imagine that it is anything other than a misbehaving transmitte
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00045.html (7,096 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:56:10 -0400
I have been hearing the same gnarly signal here in southern NH for a few days or more & thought it was local also but obviously much more wide spread. Very loud here (FN42dr) in early evenings and AM
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00047.html (8,015 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:00:21 -0400
I hear it as well. I went as far as to run off battery power and kill the main breakers but it remained. I live near Amtrak with their overhead electrical lines and thought it might be from some of t
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00048.html (8,573 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 18:15:26 +0000
Anyone else have a reliable direction on a different 2 pm in New Jersey. It is 3 S units above background noise with my NE terminated Beverage, S5 and S2. Rig -K3, 400 Hz bandwidth, cw-R mode, 1810.6
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00060.html (8,260 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 18:30:10 +0000
I removed the termination. Same signal level, S5. Now the real question is, does my Beverage have any f/b? Well, it is 550 ft long, 470 ohm termination, 9:1 transformer. Is this a waste of time, or u
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00063.html (8,131 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Ferguson" <Paul@PaulFerguson.us>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 18:19:20 -0400
73, Paul K5ESW _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00084.html (8,335 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: Eric Tichansky NO3M <no3m@no3m.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 18:42:27 -0400
East from near Erie, PA. No SE antenna to try, so can't determine if the signal favors that direction from here or not. Freq. is 1810.53 when zero-beat in CW, but does not seem particularly stable, m
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00086.html (8,934 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 22:51:26 +0000 (UTC)
Gentlemen,   I honestly thought that was a growler here at my house (typically caused by a wallwart or TV) and had no idea that others were hearing it. Today I took another look at it and opened up o
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00087.html (8,718 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Wilkowski" <dxradio@k8fc.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 19:12:49 -0400
Listening this evening this signal is slightly SE of my location (FN13BD) near Rochester NY. Both the beverages and 4 square confirm this without ambiguity. __________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00088.html (8,696 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: "John Kaufmann" <john.kaufmann@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:16:39 -0400
73, John W1FV _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00089.html (9,177 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: Bert Barry <bertbarry@xplornet.ca>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:52:40 -0400
The "1810.8" signal now appears to be at 1810.5, with a peaks about 200 or 300 Hz on either side. I estimate its bearing is just East of South (perhaps 160 degrees), from near Ottawa, FN25. Bert VE3Q
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00091.html (8,717 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: "W1ZC" <W1ZC@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 20:43:21 -0400
NYC/NJ areas? More observations will help. 73s, Dick, W1ZC FN42dr Listening this evening this signal is slightly SE of my location (FN13BD) near Rochester NY. Both the beverages and 4 square confirm
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00096.html (9,201 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: Neal Layman <n4xu@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 20:52:02 -0400
From FN20ee - Chester County, PA - the noise on 1810.5 +/- is S9 plus, very little variance. Haven't listened during the day, but very strong tonight. N4XU NYC/NJ areas? More observations will help.
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00097.html (9,266 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 21:02:32 -0400 (EDT)
Signal S7 in Fishers Indiana (10 miles NE of Indianapolis) tonight at 8:30 pm EDT, and beam heading approximately 100 degrees (equal signal on my pennant beaming 40 degrees and my pennant beaming 160
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00098.html (9,418 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@hughes.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 21:03:13 -0400
Signal is S9+5db here on 1/4 wave vertical, and S9 on short NE beverage. No way to estimate direction though. I'm near Springfield MA, north of Hartford CT. FN32 42-01N 72-43W -- Tom/K1KI -- e-mail:
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00099.html (8,970 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: Spurious Signal on 1810.8 (score: 1)
Author: "David Raymond" <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 20:11:05 -0500
I am hearing it here in EN21xm. Signal strength varies from S1 to S5. I will check again tomorrow but I don't believe the signal appeared until my SS, so I don't believe it is a local signal. It is d
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00100.html (9,164 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu