Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Steady\s+Carrier\s+on\s+80\s+CW\s*$/: 79 ]

Total 79 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Duffy" <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:45:14 -0400
I know this is the TopBand reflector - but there has been a carrier on 3501.4 for the past few days - that needs some DF work. It peaks at 150 degrees from K3LR so South South East. It is S9 this eve
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00252.html (6,416 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Duffy" <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:37:57 -0400
There appears to be a second carrier coming from the same direction on 3503.1. It is not as strong as the one on 3501.4. So whatever is going on - two steady carriers are on the low end of 80 CW. 73,
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00253.html (7,177 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 00:07:54 -0400
Africa maybe?? Or maritime? Charlie, K4OTV - Both carriers peak on my 150 degree Beverage as well. So either the source is far away from me and Tim or my direction finding is lousy. The carriers vary
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00000.html (7,901 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 00:19:23 -0400
Seems that I saw something a while back about some fishing beacons on the low end of 80m ( or maybe 160m -but I think it was 80m) Charlie, K4OTV - Both carriers peak on my 150 degree Beverage as well
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00001.html (8,450 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 00:31:19 -0400
FYI http://www.w8ji.com/ndb%20beacon%20fish%20buoy%20net%20beacons.htm (Looks like Tom knows a bit about those beacons - including fishing and driftnet beacons. Charlie, K4OTV - Both carriers peak on
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00002.html (8,136 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Victor A. Kean, Jr." <vkean@k1lt.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:57:11 -0400
Both carriers peak on my 150 degree Beverage as well. So either the source is far away from me and Tim or my direction finding is lousy. The carriers vary in strength in a pattern that does not seem
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00254.html (7,029 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 01:18:10 -0400
3.503.1 due south from SE CT. 3.501.6 due south from SE CT 73, Gary KA1J -- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com ___________
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00003.html (9,062 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 01:29:56 -0400
Well, that makes a lot more sense, Gary!! That would be down into the Atlantic or Carribean or SA. I don't understand how Victor could think that NC and SC are at 150 deg from him, if he's in New Eng
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00004.html (9,890 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 01:31:58 -0400
BTW, Gary - how are you measuring direction on 80m? 3.503.1 due south from SE CT. 3.501.6 due south from SE CT 73, Gary KA1J -- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus pr
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00005.html (9,721 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 01:49:39 -0400
Now I understand!! Victor, K1LT is NOT on New England - he's in OH! So, I guess 150 deg to NC or SC makes sense - although he could still be looking past us out into the ocean, which is what I expect
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00006.html (9,726 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 02:01:40 -0400
Actually, Gary, if we triangulate using Victor's 150 deg bearing from Carroll, Ohio and your 180 degree bearing from SE CT, we could plot an intersection and figure out just about where the source is
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00007.html (10,223 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 05:35:28 -0400
I'm using a HI-Z triangular array. Both of these signals are nulled significantly due north and are loudest due south not quite as loud SW & SE from here. -- This email is free from viruses and malwa
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00010.html (10,751 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 04:42:39 -0600
Carriers here this morning are at 3500.85 khz 3501.58 khz 3503.16 khz Using nulls from my 8-direction K9AY loop, I put the signal between 135 and 150 degrees from DN36. If that helps at all, Steve, K
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00012.html (7,949 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 06:12:20 -0500
A steady carrier from fish net beacons doesn't fit the pattern of the ones everyone has heard on 160. That would deplete the batteries fairly quickly. All the ones I know of send a short carrier and
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00013.html (9,130 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 07:33:25 -0400
Approximately 128 deg from WD8DSB (EM69) using small DF loop. _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00014.html (9,634 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 06:45:18 -0500
It's mostly S8 on my SE 580' Beverage here in SW Missouri. Rather fast QSB down to S6. On the NE 580' Bev, mostly S3 to S6, but I just saw the signal about equal on both antennas. 73, Mike www,w0btu.
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00015.html (8,555 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 06:58:51 -0500
Clarification: my "NE" Beverage is actually about 55 degrees. (The SE Bev is 135 degrees.) _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00016.html (9,377 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 08:02:49 -0400
I'm mapping the data, but nothing to hang my hat on at this time. The data from Steve (KK7UV) does not intersect any of the other reports (odd). A heading from W8JI or AA1K would be very helpful. Don
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00017.html (9,312 bytes)

19. Topband: Steady carrier on 80 cw (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lrpmbt@att.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 06:47:35 -0400
There is a carrier on 1749.3 in the same direction about 150 degrees from Michigan. Harmonics anyone. _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00018.html (7,871 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:39:53 -0400
Thanks for the information, Gary! I'm impressed with and envious of your directional resolution capability! 73, Charlie, K4OTV I'm using a HI-Z triangular array. Both of these signals are nulled sign
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00021.html (12,145 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu