Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Steady\s+Carrier\s+on\s+80\s+CW\s*$/: 79 ]

Total 79 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:05:17 -0400
Charlie, mine's nowhere as good as the 8 element array they offer and others here have far better antennae than I. This offending signal is just stronger from my south and the HI-Z antennas do work a
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00023.html (13,435 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:15:12 -0400
Thanks, Gary and Mike Well, with my small lot, about all I can do is be envious!! :-) 73, Charlie, K4OTV Charlie, mine's nowhere as good as the 8 element array they offer and others here have far bet
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00025.html (13,815 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Eric Rosenberg <ericrosenberg.dc@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 11:04:26 -0400
Funny that this should come up. My daughter Lina is part of the crew on the SSV Corwith Cramer, sailing (135ft, 2-master) that left Woods Hole, MA on October 13, sailing due south to Bequia (the Gren
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00026.html (9,957 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: nekvter@hushmail.com
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:09:55 -0400
Tim, I've been hearing these carriers for several days and confirmed with W8VVG and K4IQJ yesterday that they aren't "ghosts" in my machine. I sent the info we gathered to the ARRL (K0BOG), who will
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00032.html (8,643 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 21:32:23 -0400
Having more time this evening I went to an open field with two different portable DF antenna systems (shielded loop, and terminated flag), and I'm now going to say the signal is 140 degrees from my l
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00045.html (9,301 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 22:37:12 -0400
Oops, I compensated for true north backwards on my last report. Therefore I should have said the signal is 130 degrees from my location just NE of Indianapolis (130 degrees True heading which is very
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00046.html (10,297 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 22:46:47 -0400
Seems like it is south of me in NNJ as well as its nill on my NE flag and s4 on the SW flag. Sent from my iPad _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00047.html (10,555 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:58:28 -0500
The signals on 3501.6 and 3503.1 are both SE of me (north Alabama) but I can't locate the direction any closer than that with only a four direction receiving antenna. They are very strong, S9+5 to S9
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00048.html (8,370 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Merv Schweigert <k9fd@flex.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 18:16:22 -1000
Can hear them here in KH6 land, at least the 3500.9 and 3501.6. the 3503.1 is there also but weak, strongest is 3501.6 antenna to broad to pin point any true direction, but its coming from the "east"
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00049.html (9,199 bytes)

30. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 00:52:58 -0400
From the Virgin Islands they are 59+ on my NW Beverage and weak on my North and West Beverage. I know that is probably not much help but I send the information along for what its worth. Like Merv sai
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00050.html (9,988 bytes)

31. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Ferguson" <Paul@PaulFerguson.us>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 07:05:53 -0400
It peaks at 172 degrees from Raleigh, NC on a Hi-Z 3-element array (6 directions). We need some directions from Florida stations. 73, Paul K5ESW _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00051.html (8,468 bytes)

32. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 07:39:56 -0400
Paul and Gang, Based on Pauls heading and a few other headings that intersect Pauls heading, it looks like the signal is originating from the lower half of NC, or the NE part of SC that touches NC. H
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00052.html (8,930 bytes)

33. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 07:07:55 -0600
3501.6 is SE of me. 3500.9 is definitely NW of me and strongest of the three. Steve, KK7VU (DN36) _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00053.html (8,509 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 10:43:09 -0400
Well, most all the guys in New England see it peaking pretty much due south - which suggests that the origin is off-shore in the Atlantic, rather than on shore in the Carolinas. (Maybe from the "Berm
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00054.html (10,407 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: donovanf@starpower.net
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 10:45:11 -0400 (EDT)
A rough azimuth from W4ZV in NC would be helpful , and from Florida -- Original Message -- Paul and Gang, Based on Pauls heading and a few other headings that intersect Pauls heading, it looks like t
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00055.html (9,469 bytes)

36. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 09:52:45 -0500
I think I can do a little better on estimating the direction (better than SE which I gave earlier). I can get two 30 dB nulls out of my receiving antenna by switching directions. Those nulls appear a
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00056.html (9,708 bytes)

37. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 14:53:59 +0000
If you guys will remember from a year ago, Don is the man who pinpoints these sources, if given a few more, reliable, data points. What is needed are reports from directional loops. 2-3 feet in diam
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00057.html (10,296 bytes)

38. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 11:12:01 -0400
That's good information, Jerry! What we need, rather than relying on antenna patterns for direction, is direct phase measurement between a pair of vertical elements - with a third element (or a pair)
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00058.html (10,829 bytes)

39. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 12:32:03 -0400
Wondering if it might be a commerical station on the 2 - 3 MHz area and with a spur? Sent from my iPhone _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00059.html (10,863 bytes)

40. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 12:12:20 -0500
The signal on 3501.6 seems to have some significant power behind it. At noon (1700 UTC) it is running S7 to S1 (QSB) on my vertical. There is also an unmodulated carrier on 10.5048 MHz, but not very
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00060.html (10,143 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu