Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Straws\s+in\s+the\s+wind\,\s+continued\s+or\,\s+\"Where\'s\s+the\s+DX\?\"\s+$Epilogue$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Straws\s+in\s+the\s+wind\,\s+continued\s+or\,\s+\"Where\'s\s+the\s+DX\?\"\s+$Epilogue$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Straws in the wind, continued or, "Where's the DX?" (Epilogue) (score: 1): Author: k1zm--- via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 08:27:08 -0400; Thanks Ed. Yes, it is clear that you "GET IT" - meaning the original point of my message - so many others seemingly did NOT - HI. But that's okay because it created a lot of interest and discussio; /archives//html/Topband/2018-04/msg00056.html (15,043 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Straws in the wind, continued or, "Where's the DX?" (Epilogue) (score: 1): Author: donovanf@starpower.net; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 14:23:59 -0400 (EDT); If we could turn the clock back to the 1950s we'd hear exactly the same arguments from the AM DXers. If we turned the clock back to the early 1920s with the discovery of 40 and 20 meter DX you'd hear; /archives//html/Topband/2018-04/msg00067.html (15,919 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Straws in the wind, continued or, "Where's the DX?" (Epilogue) (score: 1): Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>; Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:22:48 -0500; As a 160 meter DX'er who is also active on EME, a similar debate of the virtues of CW -vs- JT65 (The CW competitor mode at that time) raged rather violently within the community a few years ago. So m; /archives//html/Topband/2018-04/msg00068.html (10,386 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]