Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+TEN\-TEC\s+IS\s+LISTENING\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+TEN\-TEC\s+IS\s+LISTENING\!\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: NX4D@mpinet.net (Doug Waller); Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 15:15:56 -0500; Gentlemen: Just read Ten-Tec's writeup on their new Orion transceiver. (tnx W4GD). With crystal & dsp IF filtering, adjustable rise/decay key-click control and several improvements that optimize 160m; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00065.html (7,985 bytes)
2. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: n1eu@hotmail.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 01:50:42 +0000; Doug, you didn't even mention the provision for diversity reception through two receive antennas! http://www.tentec.com/TT565.htm 73, Barry N1EU; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00066.html (7,591 bytes)
3. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: k3ky@erols.com (k3ky@erols.com); Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 04:45:08 -0500; A very impressive list of features on the website. One thing I noticed immediately is that they are using both crystal and DSP IFfiltering in the main rx, but only IF DSP in the sub-rx. I think a sub; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00068.html (8,592 bytes)
4. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 07:17:36 -0500; The thing that rang my bell most was the fact that you will be able to run very narrow roofing bandwidths on the main RX, which should really make a difference in contest conditions. Unless you're re; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00069.html (8,766 bytes)
5. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: gmguerin@voyager.net (George & Marijke Guerin); Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 08:03:55 -0500; Gentlemen: If you have comments on the proposed specifications and design for the Ten-Tec Orion, I believe it would be best to let them know directly, not just by a thread on a reflector. If you go t; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00070.html (8,412 bytes)
6. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: W2CS@bellsouth.net (Gary J. Ferdinand); Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 14:13:21 +0000; I was similary impressed, but was brought down to earth by at least a couple of things - your observation re DSP-only in the sub receiver, with which I agree, AND all the words about dual 32-bit proc; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00071.html (8,988 bytes)
7. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK); Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:49:30 -0500; TenTec could use a single roofing filter in the sub-receiver wide enough for SSB (3 KHz, 6 Pole maybe) and the ability to switch it out for wider modes (AM, FM) without a major increase in cost comp; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00072.html (8,919 bytes)
8. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: k1mk@arrl.net (Michael Keane, K1MK); Date: 8 Mar 2002 07:12:25 -0800; 32-bits of DSP is a very substantive technical claim IMHO The implication we're supposed to draw is that those DSPs are accompanied by at least 16-bits of A/D & D/A and therefore >90 dB of dynamic r; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00073.html (9,362 bytes)
9. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: k4iq@worldnet.att.net (John B. Mitchell); Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 19:34:44 +0000; I think you guys should forward all these ideas to TT. I talked with them today and the radio is not finished yet; they may incorporate some of your design ideas. They did say they'd have a prototype; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00076.html (8,575 bytes)
10. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 16:01:28 EST; I wonder what with all the specialized reflectors re: ham radio and the ready access why marketing people at the rig makers would'nt get a bit of smarts on this before they go on product designs and; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00078.html (8,894 bytes)
11. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: sire@iinet.net.au (Steve Ireland); Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 07:02:12 +0800; VK6VZ replied: G'day all, Glad to hear that Ten Tec seems to be listening. For another interesting approach, take a look at the Elecraft K2 kit at http://www.elecraft.com This goes back to a single c; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00079.html (9,804 bytes)
12. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: earlham@radiks.net (Iowaguy); Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 02:55:29 +0000; I agree with Pete. In this class, you can't expect the sub-rx to do everything. Besides, in my own application, the only thing I ever really use the sub-rx for in my 1000mp is for finding the DX list; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00080.html (8,702 bytes)
13. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 02:55:30 +0000; Or just go to Tentec@contesting.com and subscribe to the reflector. They do listen to this page. 73 Bob K4TAX; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00081.html (8,067 bytes)
14. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: k3ky@erols.com (k3ky@erols.com); Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 06:12:39 -0500; Bingo! Although Yaesu saw great prospects in offering a high-end radio that does true diversity, it was a feature of the FT-1000D that apparently went largely unused. What we are left with in the MP; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00082.html (12,205 bytes)
15. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: eric@k3na.org (Eric Scace K3NA); Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 11:35:08 +0000; For those looking for a better "sub-receiver", just get a K2 for its receive capability. If we could marry its frequency-generating and elements with a computer port, that would be grand. But it requ; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00083.html (8,041 bytes)
16. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 08:42:28 -0800; "For those looking for a better "sub-receiver", just get a K2 for its receive capability. If we could marry its frequency-generating and elements with a computer port, that would be grand. But it req; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00084.html (8,132 bytes)
17. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: sentek@sprintmail.com (Floyd Sense); Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 19:43:17 -0500; I attended the Charlotte hamfest today, and had a chance to look over the Orion prototype and twist the knobs. I really would like to buy a Ten-Tec rig (for the serviceability aspect), and I have no; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00085.html (9,661 bytes)
18. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 03:43:08 +0000; I've been wondering why the makers have long abandoned the slave receiver feature as on the TR4/R4 and S Line combos? The flexibility of two separate receivers coupled with a tight integration of eit; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00086.html (8,129 bytes)
19. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 11:41:29 +0000; I was also at the Charlotte Hamfest yesterday but I would not be so quick to judge what was obviously an early prototype. Ten-Tec is at least 6 months from production and they specifically mentioned; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00087.html (9,043 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]