Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+TX\s+antenna\s+improvements\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+TX\s+antenna\s+improvements\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: TX antenna improvements (score: 1): Author: "Neil G0JHC" <g0jhc@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 18:32:37 +0100; Looking for advice? My TX antenna is (like most) an inverted L. It is a 58ft vertical, with a 85 feet horizontal section, tied off to a tree at 60ft, with 120 Ľ radials under it, on a salt marsh, a c; /archives//html/Topband/2013-07/msg00001.html (7,000 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: TX antenna improvements (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 14:33:39 -0400; Hi, Neil that salt marsh, I really expect that moving the far end of the "flat-top" up 20' wouldn't make any real difference. I don't think I'd bother! 73, Charlie, K4OTV Looking for advice? My TX an; /archives//html/Topband/2013-07/msg00002.html (8,107 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: TX antenna improvements (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 13:20:57 -0700; Your best improvement would be to change it to a T configuration if your situation allows it. Rick N6RK _________________ Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2013-07/msg00003.html (6,930 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]